Methods

Latent Atlas asked whether a satellite foundation model's embeddings know something about Europe's surface climate that a stack of hand-crafted covariates does not. At 6 km they do not. The rest of the site maps what they do encode.

The Six-Arm Comparison

Every arm predicts COSMO-REA6 daily maximum temperature at 6 km over Europe, with ERA5 as the coarse input. The arms differ only in the static feature block appended to that input, so two rows differ only in how they represent place. Each is a quantile regression fitted per fold and scored on the fold it never saw. The folds are contiguous spatial blocks, because on an autocorrelated field a random split leaves every held-out cell's neighbours in the training set. Iberia is held out entirely and never enters the pooled statistic.

ArmStatic featuresRMSE, daily maximum (K)
bilinearnone, the interpolation floor 1.860
covhand-crafted covariates 1.469
aefAlphaEarth, 64 dimensions 1.531
aef_covboth 1.468
clayClay v1.5, per-fold PCA 1.621
mosaiksrandom texture features over the covariate rasters 1.480

Result

Pooled over 5 held-out spatial folds, the embeddings are 4.2% worse than the covariate stack on RMSE and 4.3% worse on CRPS.

Adding the embeddings to the covariates barely moves the error, and random texture features drawn over the covariate rasters come close to the covariates themselves.

The covariates are elevation, its standard deviation and topographic position index, slope, northness and eastness, distance to the coast, built-up, tree and water fraction, population density, built height, and the pixel count behind each source raster. The norms card measures what pooling from 40 m to 6 km does to the length of an AlphaEarth vector.

The Corrected Measurement

AlphaEarth stores each component as an int8 code under a signed square-root companding. The first version of this pipeline averaged the raw codes when it pooled tiles onto the 6 km grid, and the mean of companded codes is not the code of the mean vector, so every pooled direction was wrong. The rebuilt cube de-quantises before averaging and renormalises once the mosaic is assembled. Apart from the defective-cube figures quoted below, every continental-grid number on this site comes from it. The fix has its own page.

On the defective cube the embeddings were 4.17% worse than the covariates on RMSE and 4.31% worse on CRPS. On the corrected cube they are 4.19% and 4.32% worse.

Cards Measured Against Other Products

The forest, solar and wildfire cards score the embedding against a product someone else made. Each scores only places kept out of training and names its product in the sentence that gives the result. A score is agreement with that product, errors included, and validates neither the product nor the embedding.

The Year Before the Dieback

FCCL_DE_P1M, DLR's monthly 10 m canopy-loss map of Germany under CC BY 4.0 (Thonfeld et al. 2026). EFDA v3.0.0 for the disturbance agents.

Reading only the 2018 embedding, a model ranks the stands FCCL_DE_P1M records as lost in 2019 to 2021 better than 12 hand-crafted covariates do, in every one of 4 German forests. Averaged to the covariates' coarser 100 m it keeps the lead in 3 of them, but not in the Black Forest.

Watching Germany Go Solar

MaStR, the Bundesnetzagentur's Marktstammdatenregister, extract 20260921.

The embedding dates a solar park's build to within a year of the year MaStR registers for 81.0% of held-out parks. The best single year, guessed for every park, gets 65.0%.

How Long a Wildfire Is Remembered

EFFIS burnt areas, the Joint Research Centre's MODIS burnt-area perimeters, extract 20260923.

On fires far from any it trained on, the embedding tells burnt ground from its unburnt neighbours with an AUC against EFFIS of 0.9203 a year after the fire. By 3 years its interval overlaps the one the landscape alone scores before any fire (0.6488 to 0.7784).

How Cities Change describes what the embedding does over a city at 10 m and measures nothing. The remaining cards map the embedding itself: its neighbours, its outliers, its geometry, what it says about summer heat and how it moves from year to year.

Data Sources

Embeddings

The Temperature Comparison

Products the Cards Are Scored Against

Imagery and Maps

Prior Work

Searching an embedding for look-alike places is not new. Google's Earth Engine has a similarity-search app, the yagays/alphaearth-embeddings project explores the same embeddings, and Terrapattern did it for aerial imagery before either. The Unusual, Walk and Doppelgängers cards run that idea over Europe at 6 km.